"Most of the readers are from the United States who do not have any experience in [the] agricultural market or transgenic work" --Video Case Study
The rhetoric of "organic" products is rampant in the States. Everywhere we look, we see green signs with "Greenwise" (in green) written on them (Publix) or big green USDA stickers. Coffee shops advertise their "organic" and "fair trade" coffee. The rhetoric of "organic" and "natural" has even infiltrated massive corporations like McDonalds!
Agritechno
This push for organic, natural, and green is the rhetorical context that our putative "American investors" have. So, say I am an American Investor, who realizes that the rage in the market is a push for natural and organic products. As the video case study says, Agritechno uses transgenic (genetically modified) foods and crops--not 'organic'. The point of the definitions are to try and persuade investors that there are many benefits to genetically modified crops rather than the potential threats and dangers.
In other words, the LAST image I want to see is this one:
A few of you used this image. This image is very unsettling to someone who is already on the fence about 'genetically modified' anything as well as aware of the push in my country toward organic foods. A couple things:
- When you find this image on google images, it is prudent to go to the source of that image. My source was called "treehugger.com," which was using the image to illustrate that transgenic crops were "banned around the world." Thus, the image is illustrating a negative attitude toward transgenic crops.
What does this image implicitly argue?
Let us start with the hand in a stark white scientist glove. There is nothing "natural" looking about this hand. It is sterile, disinterested, and perhaps even a bit sinister. Particularly because it is holding a syringe of bright blue liquid, contrasting heavily with the yellow and green of the corn. There is nothing 'natural' looking about this deep blue. It looks as if (as I commented in some of your papers) the corn is receiving botox or some sort of superdrug, rather than other genetic material from other species of plants. The corn itself, and, though some of you may think this is a stretch, has its husk peeled back--it is naked and at the mercy of the cold, white hand and the foreign blue substance. There is a sort of vulnerability to the corn and, if looked at closely, it almost seems to have human qualities. The husks jut out like splayed arms.
So, in conclusion: This is not the kind of image that will help you address the needs of your American, organic loving audience.